Abstract: A scientific study conducted to compare the absolute size of bodily organs between subject A (me) and subject B (Malaysia’s Inspector General of Police).
Methodology:
PART A
1. Place entire mass of subject B into beaker M (for Malaysia).
2. Carefully remove “Common Sense” as well as remaining “Lateral and Critical Thinking” from subject.
3. Place entire mass of subject A into same beaker.
4. Prepare a liquid mixture of
· 1/2g of acidic politics.
· 5g of unsterilized money.
· 100ml of crime preheated to melting point.
4. Pour the prepared liquid mixture into the beaker at various intervals for 2 years.
5. Monitor and record the response.
PART B
1. Expose beaker M to beaker J (Japan) and beaker HK (Hong Kong)
2. Monitor and record the response.
Results:
After 2 years of continuous exposure, Subject B has shown to posses the ability to react exothermically with the liquid mixture to form a layer of sludge which lets out a pungent odor.
Subject B seems to be able to neutralize the 100ml of crime but has preferred instead to develop a barrier to filter out the amount of crime it can absorb. This barrier has been dubbed “Shield of Ignorance”.
Subject A seems to have been gravely affected by all this but seems determined to grow and develop regardless.
In part B of the experiment, Subject A has shown a great attraction to the particles in beaker J and HK, which is not surprising seeing as they both have a more ideal environment in which to grow in.
Subject B however, produced a statistical study outlining that beaker M has a much better environment compared to J and HK and presented it to everyone.
Discussion:
Subject B has shown very peculiar actions unlike that in which was previously predicted. Subject B has been created solely for the purpose of neutralizing the ingredients in the liquid mixture. But it seems that it is more concerned with protecting itself and allowing Subject A to take the brunt of the damage. It is thought that exposure to the more ideal environments would prompt Subject B to act accordingly but instead it has ignored the other beakers and has gone so far as to further produce a statistical lie to save itself.
Conclusion:
In conclusion Subject B is totally useless and has testosities which are inferior to that of Subject A.
In layman’s term MY BALLS ARE BIGGER THAN TAN SRI MUSA’s. I am not afraid to acknowledge that the crime rate in Malaysia is worsening and I also have the decency to not lie about it. I do not say that high crime rate is “just the perception of the public” and be stupidly complacent with the situation of the country as it stands now. I do not mess with the statistics and say that Malaysia is safer than Hong Kong or Japan! Why is Tan Sri Musa the inspector general of the police anyway? He is just a frail old douche who doesn’t care about public safety. I bet as a kid he was horrible at playing hide-and-seek. When it’s his turn to be seeker instead of looking for the hiders, he would go around convincing his other friends that he found everyone, although he never did.
No comments:
Post a Comment